Product discovery
The term was popularized by Marty Cagan (Inspired, 2017) and Teresa Torres (Continuous Discovery Habits, 2021), who argue that discovery is not a phase prior to development but rather a continuous activity running in parallel with delivery.
Discovery vs. delivery
- Discovery: Which problem is worth solving? Will this solution work? Is it valuable to the user and viable for the business?
- Delivery: Building the agreed solution with quality and reliability.
The dual-track agile model proposes running both in parallel: while one track delivers the committed work, the other explores the opportunities for the next cycle.
The Discovery Cycle
Discovery follows an iterative flow:
- Framing the problem: Separate the symptom from the root cause. Formulate the challenge from the user's perspective, rather than from the perspective of the solution. Tool: Jobs to Be Done.
- Mapping assumptions: Explicitly list the assumptions upon which the solution depends. Classic categories include desirability, viability, and feasibility; Teresa Torres adds usability and ethics, while David Bland includes adaptability. These are prioritized using the importance vs. evidence matrix from Bland’s Assumptions Mapping: test the important assumptions that lack supporting evidence first. While it is common to start with desirability, the specific quadrant dictates the priority.
- Designing the experiment: Choose the most efficient method to validate the most critical assumption—such as an interview, a prototype, a learning MVP, or an A/B test.
- Evaluating the evidence: Analyze results with skepticism, distinguishing patterns from noise and correlation from causation. Evidence is stronger the more closely an observation resembles a real-world decision that carries a cost for the person making it: an opinion carries less weight than a sign-up, and a sign-up carries less weight than an actual payment.
- Deciding: Persevere, iterate, pivot, or stop—capturing the learnings regardless of the outcome.
Common tools
- Interview snapshots to accumulate learning from user interviews.
- Opportunity solution tree to organize opportunities, solutions, and experiments.
- Story map to connect discovery with the backlog.
- Minimum viable product to validate hypotheses with minimum effort.
Common mistake
Treating discovery as a phase that is done at the start of the project and then closed. Torres's continuous discovery proposes a weekly cadence of user interviews as a steady practice, not as a one-off activity. Markets change and product hypotheses become invalid. A team that did discovery six months ago and has spent months in pure delivery is building up the risk of misalignment with the user's real needs.
Resources
🏦 Customer discovery and validationState of the art and guide · Skill Arena
📄 Product Owner v.2.0 [in Spanish]Free download · Scrum Manager
References
- Cagan, Marty. (2017). Inspired: How to Create Tech Products Customers Love. Wiley.
- Torres, Teresa. (2021). Continuous Discovery Habits. Product Talk LLC.
See also
Want to advance in agility? You can search for course and exam calls or go at your own pace by becoming a member of the Agile Club. This membership includes exclusive resources, e-learning classrooms, and access to Skill Arena: a space to practice and measure your agile skills at your own pace.